TROVA Book a demo →
From the TROVA blog

The 49% vs 38%
close-rate math.
And what it means for your shop.

The ACCA / Farmington 2026 study of 1,000+ contractors found a clean 11-point close-rate gap between contractors who offer financing the right way and contractors who don't. Here's what that gap is worth in real dollars — and why the size of the gap surprises most owners.

30-day pilot. Walk away if it doesn't lift your close rate.
Published by TROVA · Updated June 17, 2026 · 6-minute read

The number.

From the ACCA / Farmington Consulting Group 2026 "Contractor of the Future" survey, 1,000+ contractors:

  • Contractors who offer financing: 49% close rate on jobs presented in-home.
  • Contractors who don't: 38% close rate.
  • Difference: 11 percentage points.

11 points is a number that sounds small until you do the math against your shop's actual call volume.

The math for a $5M plumbing shop.

Let's take a typical residential plumbing shop doing $5M annual revenue:

  • Average ticket: $1,200 (heavy on service, weighted by repipes and water heaters).
  • Estimated calls per year: 4,200.
  • Current close rate: 38% (no consistent financing presentation).
  • Current closed deals: 1,596.
  • Current revenue: $1,915,200.

Now apply the financing lift:

  • Post-financing close rate: 49%.
  • Post-financing closed deals: 2,058.
  • Post-financing revenue: $2,469,600.
  • Annual lift: $554,400.

That's the close-rate gap alone. Stack the 13% larger ticket from Synchrony — also presented as a benefit of financing-in-conversation — and the picture changes again.

Stacking the ticket lift.

  • New average ticket: $1,356 (13% lift).
  • Closed deals: 2,058.
  • Stacked revenue: $2,790,648.
  • Annual lift over baseline: $875,448.

This is where the 46–68% revenue-per-estimate framing comes from — and the lower bound of that range is what most shops hit with consistent execution. The upper bound is what shops with disciplined financing-as-promotion presentation hit.

The trap.

Most shops "offer financing" — in the sense that it's on the pricebook, the rep is trained, and the option exists. ACCA's data isn't about whether financing exists. It's about whether it gets PRESENTED in the conversation, in the right moment, the right way.

In the typical trades sales call, financing gets mentioned in maybe 40% of conversations where it should be brought up. The remaining 60% are reps either forgetting, fumbling the words, or hesitating because they're worried about being "salesy."

That 60% miss IS the 11-point gap.

Why coaching closes it.

Closing the financing-mention gap requires the rep to say the right words in the right moment — usually after the diagnosis is complete and the recommendation is on the table, before the customer says "I'll think about it."

Training reps to do this consistently is hard. Some get it; some don't. Top reps internalize the rhythm; bottom-half reps don't.

This is where TROVA real-time coaching closes the gap. The wearable captures the conversation. The AI recognizes the moment — recommendation on the table, customer hesitation forming — and cues the financing-as-promotion phrase into the rep's ear. The customer never hears the cue. The financing gets brought up. The 11-point gap collapses.

The pilot.

If you're running a shop doing $1M – $25M and want to measure what this math looks like for YOUR shop, the TROVA 30-day pilot baselines your close rate, runs 3–5 techs with the wearable, and measures the lift against the prior 90 days.

If the numbers don't move, you walk away.

Book a 20-min demo to size the pilot →

Talk it through.
On a 20-min demo.

If something in this post raised questions, the fastest answer is the demo.

30-day pilot. No commitment kicks in until the numbers move.
Book a 20-min demo
Pick a time below. We'll send a calendar invite the moment you confirm.
Loading available times…
Confirm a slot to get a calendar invite — or skip it and we'll reach out to schedule.
Book a demo →